Legal Opinion
Pendergrass v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 6, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2019-3331Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GALEN PENDERGRASS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-3331 (EGS) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff Galen Pendergrass (“Mr. Pendergrass” or “Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.; the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”),
D.C. Code § 2-1401, et seq.; the Fair Credit Reporting Act…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.