Legal Opinion

Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co. v. Hughes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 12, 1903PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Admiralty. Action to recover for injury of vessel at respondents’ bulkhead.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the libellant to recover the damages caused its barge, the H. & N. Y. T. Co. No. 3, and the cargo of stone on board, of which it was bailee, by sinking while lying at the respondents’ bulkhead in the East river, at Ravenswood, Long Island, on or about the 1st day of July, 1895.

The barge was 123 feet long and about 28 feet wide, and drew, when loaded as she was this day, 7 feet 4 inches forward and 8 feet 6 inches aft. The bulkhead had been constructed for two or three months before the accident. It was 75 feet long and had a depth of water of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia, Wilmington, & Baltimore Railroad v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Carleton v. Franconia Iron & Steel Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Nickerson v. TirrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Sawyer v. OakmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Citgo Asphalt Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Look v. Portsmouth, K. & Y. St. Ry.District Court, D. Maine · 1905
  3. Cornell Steamboat Co. v. GladstoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  4. P. Dougherty Co. v. Bader Coal Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
  5. Carroll v. HolwayDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API