Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Hinton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1980No. 7910SC244PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

It has been established that summary judgment is an appropriate procedure in a declaratory judgment action. Frank H. Connor Co. v. Spanish Inns Charlotte, 294 N.C. 661, 242 S.E. 2d 785 (1978); Blades v. City of Raleigh, 280 N.C. 531, 187 S.E. 2d 35 (1972).

The will of Nehemiah Hinton first directed his executor to pay all of his debts, funeral expenses, costs of administration, and estate and inheritance taxes. The will by Article II provided that:

After the payment of all such debts, expenses, taxes and obligations, I give, bequeath, devise and appoint unto my son, Thomas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Frank H. Conner Co. v. Spanish Inns Charlotte, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Moore v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Collier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Hejl v. Hood, Hargett & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Medearis v. Trustees of Myers Park Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Pine Knoll Association, Inc. v. CardonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Hendrickson v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API