Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Hays

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 2005No. 04-0264/ARPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErdmann, Judge

In United States v. Martinelli, 62 M.J. 52 (C.A.A.F.2005), we determined that the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA) has no extraterritorial application. Under the factual circumstances presented in this case, I agree with the majority’s conclusion that Hays’ guilty pleas to the four CPPA-based specifications were improvident on that basis. 1 therefore concur with the majority in regard to Issue IV.

As noted in Martinelli, an improvident plea to a CPPA-based offense may, under certain circumstances, be upheld as provident to a lesser included offense under clauses 1 or 2 of Article 134,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. ReynoldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  5. United States v. HouserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API