Legal Opinion
Eccles v. Nelson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 27, 2006No. 5D05-3423PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.
The petitioner, Karen Eccles, seeks cer-tiorari review of an order disqualifying her attorney, George W. Salter, from representing her at the trial of a will contest below. Because we find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the trial court’s order disqualifying Mr. Salter, we deny the petition.
We note at the outset that an order ruling on a motion to disqualify a party’s chosen counsel is renewable by certiorari. See Schultz v. Schultz, 783 So.2d 329 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Eggers v. Eggers, 776 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Certiora-ri relief, however, should not be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bates v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Concerned Dog Owners v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Thomas v. DelgadoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Jacobson v. Southeast Personnel Leasing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Lake Royale Landowners Assn. v. DenglerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Suchite v. KleppinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2011