Legal Opinion

Arthur v. State, Department of Hawaiian Home Lands.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2016No. SCWC-13-0000531PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

This case is a contract dispute between Petitioners/Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants Sato and Associates, Inc. and Daniel S. Miyasato (collectively, “Sato” or “Engineer”), and Respondent/Defendant/Appel-lee/Cross-Appellee Kamehameha Investment Corporation (“KIC” or “Developer”). Sato timely applied for writ of certiorari (“Application”) on August 7, 2015 from a June 8, 2015 Judgment entered by the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”) pursuant to its February 27, 2015 Opinion (“Opinion”). In relevant part, the ICA affirmed the Circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Herson v. New Boston Garden Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Hawaiian Holiday MacAdamia Nut Co. v. Industrial Indemnity Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Pancakes of Hawaii, Inc. v. Pomare Properties Corp.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Kamali v. Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Haole v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hawaiian Dredging Construction Company, Inc. v. Fujikawa Associates, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Leandre Aarndel v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation; Amerada Hess Corporation; Litwin Corporation; Shell Oil Corporation; U.O.P. LLC; and American CyanamidSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API