Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Flood

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 28, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this estate a compulsory accounting by the trustees was ordered. Objections were filed to the account by certain of the parties interested, and the issues were referred to a *798referee to hear and determine. These objections raise a question as to the interpretation of paragraph 3 of the will, particularly with regard to the payment of income for the support of Bridget Flood, the mother of the testator, and the primary life tenant. They also involve the responsibility of the trustees for certain expenditures claimed to have been made for that purpose. While it would appear that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of WentworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Rezzemini v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. New York Trust Co. v. BlackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. The New York Trust Company v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. In re the Estate of HartleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HaydenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of LittmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of RosenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  5. In re the Estate of FloodNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API