Disciplinary Counsel v. Engel.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
*209 {¶ 1} Respondent, Andrew Mahlon Engel, of Centerville, Ohio, Attorney Registration *483 No. 0047371, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1990.
{¶ 2} On November 21, 2001, we publicly reprimanded Engel for neglecting a legal matter and attempting to handle it without adequate preparation. Dayton Bar Assn. v. Engel , 93 Ohio St.3d 623 , 758 N.E.2d 178 (2001). And on December 22, 2004, we suspended him from the practice of law for two years with six months of the suspension stayed on conditions for intentionally failing to seek the lawful objectives of a client, intentionally failing to…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. BerkOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. JoltinOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Disciplinary Counsel v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. BancsiOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Counsel v. FordOhio Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CarrOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. BulsonOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Columbus Bar Assn. v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Barbera (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- Disciplinary Counsel v. DaniellOhio Supreme Court · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.