Legal Opinion
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Willard Mirror Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 25, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1397PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a railroad corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Missouri with its principal office in the City of St. Louis, owns and operates a system of railroads in interstate commerce, extending in and through the State of Arkansas and the City of Fort Smith.
The defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Arkansas with its principal place of business in the City of Fort Smith.
On January 31, 1958, the plaintiff filed its complaint against the defendant in which it alleges:
“On January 27, 1956, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Binderup v. Pathe Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Swafford v. TempletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- TM Partridge Lumber Co. v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Eickhof Construction Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Southern Pacific Co. v. FishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. M. E. Belt and Hazel Belt, D/B/A Belt Fur and Wool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977