TM Partridge Lumber Co. v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, District Judge.
On April 18, 1922, the plaintiff in error, defendant below and hereinafter referred to as the defendant, shipped a ear of cedar poles from St. Boniface, Manitoba, to itself at Pinconning, Mich. Later the shipment was reeonsigned, and on or about May 16, 1922, delivered to the Detroit Edison Company at Detroit. Defendant should have paid defendant in error, plaintiff below and hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, $345.63 as freight charges. It did pay $386.50, or $40.87 more than was justly due. It claimed a refund, and was erroneously refunded $60.21 more than the amount…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Toledo, P. & W. R. R. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Eickhof Construction Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Willard Mirror Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Kurn v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1942
- Sanantex Oil Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.