Interlocking Stone Co. v. Scribner
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County refusing to dissolve an attachment in an action of interpleader. Wm. H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought in interpleader by plaintiff under section 386 of the Code of Civil Procedure, providing that “Whenever conflicting claims are, or may be, "made upon a person for, or relating to personal property, or the performance of an obligation, or any portion thereof, such person may bring an action against the conflicting claimants to compel them to interplead and litigate their several claims among themselves.”
It appears by the complaint that plaintiff is indebted on an open account to the defendant M. G. Scribner in the sum of $577, and on a promissory note, dated July 30,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Van Orden v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Rose v. PearmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Allers v. Beverly Hills Laundry, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Knapp v. B. Nicoll & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931