Legal Opinion

Peterson v. McNichols

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 24, 1953No. 16974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

This is an action for recovery of license fees exacted under an invalid ordinance.

Plaintiff in error is the assignee of claimants for refund of license fees totaling $15,898.00. Defendants in error are the City and County of Denver, a municipal corporation, its auditor, and manager of revenue and ex-officio treasurer. This action was instituted under Rule 106 of our rules of civil procedure to compel the defendants to approve and pay these assigned claims. On trial to the court, the complaint was dismissed on grounds presently to be discussed. This judgment of dismissal is before us for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston v. KirschwingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Davis v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Skyland Metropolitan District v. Mountain West Enterprise, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Colorado Racing Commission v. Brush Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Stone v. CurriganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Skyland Metro. Dist. v. MOUNTAIN WEST ENTERPRISEColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API