Legal Opinion

Houston v. Kirschwing

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 11, 1947No. 15,865PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs below sought judgment declaring void certain sections of an ordinance regulating sale of solid fuels within the City and County of Denver. At the close of the evidence the court sustained defendants’ motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs had shown no right to relief.

The evidence discloses that the fuel with which the ordinance is primarily concerned is coal; that there are numerous coal mines within trucking distance from Denver producing coal of varying qualities and that there are two classes of dealers engaged in its sale and distribution at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Sverkerson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Larson v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Moffitt v. City of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Westrac, Inc. v. Walker Field, Colorado, Public Airport AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. State v. ParsonsArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. King County v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. City of Central v. AxtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API