Siegel v. City of Branson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
The principal dispute here is whether Defendant City of Branson may operate a campground. The trial judge determined that it could, finding these facts, which essentially are not in dispute:
1.Defendant City of Branson operates its two adjoining campgrounds as a part of its park system, under the direction of the Park Board and the Parks Director. These campgrounds provide, in addition to camping sites, the following functions:
a. four fishing docks
b. two boat docks
e.launch ramps
d. three pavilions
e. one bike route
f. several parking areas
g. playground
h. showers and restrooms
i.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- State Ex Rel. St. Louis Housing Authority v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Nash v. . TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas City, Inc. v. NixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Burks v. City of LickingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Saint Paul v. State Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008