Legal Opinion

Siegel v. City of Branson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1997No. Nos. 20961, 21139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

The principal dispute here is whether Defendant City of Branson may operate a campground. The trial judge determined that it could, finding these facts, which essentially are not in dispute:

1.Defendant City of Branson operates its two adjoining campgrounds as a part of its park system, under the direction of the Park Board and the Parks Director. These campgrounds provide, in addition to camping sites, the following functions:

a. four fishing docks

b. two boat docks

e.launch ramps

d. three pavilions

e. one bike route

f. several parking areas

g. playground

h. showers and restrooms

i.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Cape Motor Lodge, Inc. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  4. State Ex Rel. St. Louis Housing Authority v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. Nash v. . TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas City, Inc. v. NixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Burks v. City of LickingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. City of Saint Paul v. State Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API