Harpole v. Harpole
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Judge.
This is a divorce case in which the appellee was granted the divorce. The decisive question on appeal is whether appellee’s proof was sufficient to establish her cause of action.
The appellee filed her complaint alleging general indignities. Appellant answered, denying such allegations and requesting that appellee’s complaint be dismissed. At trial, appellant’s counsel made the following opening statement:
May it please the Court. At the outset, we, of course, have filed an answer and counterclaim in the case, but as a practical matter we will not fight the grounds for divorce.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moose v. GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Bass v. KollerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Gregory v. MooseCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
- Coffey v. CoffeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pelt v. State Board of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Oates v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
- Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Gunnell v. GunnellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.