Legal Opinion

Fortune v. Hooven

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 31, 1931No. 30,485PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action the plaintiffs seek to permanently enjoin the defendant from declaring the old districts disorganized. The elections for the consolidation of two rural high-school districts were held as provided by chapter 275 of the Laws of 1931, and the injunction is asked for on the ground that illegal votes were cast at the election. The trial court granted a temporary injunction, and from this order the defendant appeals.

This court has repeatedly held that private persons have no standing to question the legality of proceedings to organize a rural high-school district, nor to enjoin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. School District No. 38 v. Rural High School District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Elting v. CloustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Scamahorn v. PerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  4. Bealmear v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  2. Dunn v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. School District No. 14 v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API