Legal Opinion

People v. Jose

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1999PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination whether defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy involved a mixed question of law and fact. Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s determination of this mixed question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review (see, e.g., People v Ortiz, 83 NY2d 840, 843).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. ZappullaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. LeachNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. TuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API