Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1994PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The defendant was found guilty, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was thereafter sentenced to four and one-half to nine years’ imprisonment. A divided panel of the Appellate Division affirmed the conviction, agreeing with the suppression court that the defendant had no standing to challenge the warrantless entry into his girlfriend’s apartment, and that defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized by the arresting officer was properly denied.

One…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. People v. PonderNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. People v. MayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. ShireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. JoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API