Legal Opinion

Garland v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1970No. 9001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Presiding Judge.

Joseph Garland and his wife, plaintiff Barbara Garland, were insureds of defendant American Family Mutual Insurance Company, whose policy afforded uninsured motorist coverage in the amount of $10,000.1 Joseph figured in an automobile collision with an uninsured motorist and on November 14, 1968, he filed suit against defendant to enforce payment for his injuries. The case was set for trial for the “jury week” commencing August 11, 1969. On July 10, 1969, plaintiff received from defendant a written notice that pursuant to Rule 66.01 (c) 2 her claim for the loss of her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  2. Hill v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Shepherd v. Consumers Cooperative AssociationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Edwards v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Dean v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gooch v. SpradlingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Wendt v. General Accident Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Cline v. Carthage Crushed Limestone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  4. Siskind v. NorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Stacy v. Department of Public Health & WelfareMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API