Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2002No. 01-10116PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Per curiam

Thomas Charles Brown appeals from the district court’s denial of his initial petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Brown argues that his sentence should be vacated because of the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We hold that the new rule of criminal procedure announced in Apprendi does not apply retroactively on initial collateral review and affirm the district court’s dismissal of Brown’s habeas petition.

I

Thomas Charles Brown was charged by indictment on July 29, 1993, with conspiracy to possess with the intent to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Washington, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. People v. De La PazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. Gary Lee SampsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary BeaumontCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API