Consolidated Arizona Smelting Co. v. Hinchman
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maine; Clarence Hale, Judge. Suit by Charles S. Hinchman against the Consolidated Arizona Smelting Company. From a decree (198 Fed. 907) for complainant, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The decree of the District Court is in-part to the effect that the appellant, Consolidated Arizona Smelting-Company, a Maine corporation, now' holds its title to mines in Arizona known as the “Blue Bell Mines,” subject to two agreements of the Arizona Blue Bell Copper Company; the first, of September 15, 1906,. with John L. Elliot, the second, of November 15, 1906, with the Consolidated Arizona Smelting Company, a New Jersey corporation, and “especially subject to the payment of the balance of the purchase price-of $900,000, in accordance with the terms of said…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stratton's Independence, Ltd. v. HowbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Kettle River Railroad v. Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lingle Water Users' Ass'n v. Occidental Building & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Herigstad v. Hardrock Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Johnson v. GeddesUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Munro v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1917
- Johnson v. GeddesUtah Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.