Legal Opinion
William Feinstein Bros., Inc. v. LZ Hotte Granite Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 18, 1962No. 1913PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*168Holden, J.
This controversy has developed from a contract for the purchase and sale of two hundred monuments. The plaintiff buyer is a retail dealer in granite markers. The defendant seller is a manufacturer of these commodities. At the close of all the evidence a verdict on both issues of liability and damages was directed for the plaintiff. This appeal by the defendant challenges this action by the trial court on the ground that the evidence required these questions be submitted to the jury.
On November 1, 1955 the defendant’s salesman obtained an order for the purchase of five different…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Helgar Corporation v. . Warner's FeaturesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Barlow Manufacturing Co. v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- White v. Lumiere North American Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Producers Coke Co. v. HillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Taplin v. MarcySupreme Court of Vermont · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Breslauer v. Fayston School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Benoir v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Cross-Abbott Company v. Howard's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- First Wisconsin Mortgage Trust v. Wyman's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- Addison County Automotive, Inc. v. ChurchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.