Holiday v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred fundamentally by giving the jury the standard instruction on entrapment in effect in 1997, when this offense and appellant’s trial took place. The standard instruction was changed effective July, 1998, and is now consistent with the supreme court’s analysis of the entrapment defense found in Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993). See Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases, 723 So.2d 123 (Fla. 1998). See also Vazquez v. State, 700 So.2d 5 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), appeal dismissed, 718 So.2d 755 (Fla.1998). It is undisputed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Munoz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (97-2)Supreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Vazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- State v. VazquezSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holiday v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999