Legal Opinion

Vandooren v. Vandooren

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1975No. 753DC547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Plaintiff’s only assignment of error is that the court erred by amending on its own motion the original pendente lite order to provide that the guest house rental be credited against alimony, on the grounds of mistake in the original order.

G.S. 50-16.9 provides that “An order . . . for alimony or alimony pendente lite . . . may be modified or vacated at any time, upon motion in the cause and a showing of changed circumstances by either party or anyone interested. ...” The judge entered findings of fact that defendant’s income during the'- eighteen-month period had increased but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rabon v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. H & B COMPANY OF STATESVILLE v. HammondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinson v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Food Service Specialists v. Atlas Restaurant Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Plomaritis v. PlomaritisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API