Legal Opinion

S & G INC. v. Intermountain Power Agency

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1996No. 940597PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:

S & G Incorporated appeals a district court order dismissing with prejudice its claims for relief. S & G’s complaint alleged three claims against Intermountain Power Agency (IPA) that arose out of a contract wherein S & G agreed to sell to IPA water rights appurtenant to land S & G owned near Delta, Utah. The district court dismissed S & G’s first and third claims, one sounding in contract and the other in tort, on statute of limitations grounds; and on cross-motions for summary judgment the court ruled that S & G had entered into an accord and satisfaction…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Admiral Mortgage, Inc. v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Clarke v. Living Scriptures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  3. Larry J. Coet Chevrolet v. LabrumCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  4. Pearson v. South Jordan CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  5. Mineral Resources International, Inc. v. Trace Minerals Research, L.C. (In re Mineral Resources International, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API