Legal Opinion
Pearson v. South Jordan City
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided March 29, 2012No. 20100446-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McHUGH, Presiding Judge:
€ 1 The City of South Jordan (the City or South Jordan) appeals from the trial court's order granting partial summary judgement in favor of Daniel Pearson. The trial court concluded that South Jordan could not terminate Pearson's employment without meeting the procedural requirements afforded to certain public employees under Utah Code see-tions 10-38-1105 and 10-83-1106. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 10-38-1105 to -1106 (2007). 1 We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
12 This dispute arises from the January 30, 2007 termination of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- North Fork Special Service District v. BennionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- Ruth B. Hardy Revocable Trust v. RindlesbachCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015