Legal Opinion

Glitz v. Sandridge Energy Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 2020No. 5:12-cv-01341Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) IN RE SANDRIDGE ENERGY, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) Case No. CIV-12-1341-G ) ORDER Now before the Court is the Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 463) filed by Plaintiffs.1 See also Doc. Nos. 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469. Defendant SandRidge Energy, Inc. (“SandRidge”) has responded (Doc. No. 496), and the matter is now at issue. A. Requests for Admission Plaintiffs object to SandRidge’s responses to Request for Admission (“RFA”) Nos. 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, and 11. Under Rule 36(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, parties…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Disability Rights Council of Greater Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Stark-Romero v. National Railroad Passenger Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API