Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dover v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1917No. 4463Published

The opinion states the case.

1ConcurrenceMorrow, Judge

(concurring). — In agreeing to the reversal of this cause we deem it proper to state that in our judgment the testimony given by the officers who had appellant under arrest, that while under arrest, without warning, he made in their presence a verbal statement which was used on the trial against him, was not admissible. The Code of Criminal Procedure, article 810, provides that the “confession of the accused shall not be used if at the time it was made the defendant was in jail or other place of confinement, or while he was in the custody of an officer, unless made in the voluntary statement…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Parks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Hernan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API