Legal Opinion

Hernan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1901No. 2250PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Dallas. Tried below before Hon. Charles F. Clint. Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion sufficiently illustrates the questions discussed, and no further statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary, and he prosecutes this appeal.

There are but two bills of exception in the record, and both appear to be well taken. The first bill relates to the admission of a statement of appellant while he was under arrest, not having been cautioned. Appellant relied on alibi as his defense, and introduced testimony to show that he was at another and different place in the city of Dallas on the night of the alleged burglary and at the time thereof. On the trial he was a witness…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Stanchel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Cortez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API