Legal Opinion

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Flanagan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1997No. 96-1992PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Count one of relator’s complaint charges that respondent failed to provide adequate representation to the Smiths. The primary functions of a lawyer are counseling and advocacy. In this case the respondent failed to perform either task.

The counseling of a client in financial matters, particularly about his or her choice of remedies under the Bankruptcy Code or whether a bankruptcy proceeding can be avoided, is a serious matter that deserves the attention of a qualified attorney. Such counseling would involve, among other things, the effect of an insolvency proceeding on the client’s credit…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re CastorenaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  2. In Re ICLNDS Notes Acquisition, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. MullaneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re MerriamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2000
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. WillardOhio Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API