Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Flanagan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Count one of relator’s complaint charges that respondent failed to provide adequate representation to the Smiths. The primary functions of a lawyer are counseling and advocacy. In this case the respondent failed to perform either task.
The counseling of a client in financial matters, particularly about his or her choice of remedies under the Bankruptcy Code or whether a bankruptcy proceeding can be avoided, is a serious matter that deserves the attention of a qualified attorney. Such counseling would involve, among other things, the effect of an insolvency proceeding on the client’s credit…
2Cited by15 opinions
- In Re CastorenaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
- In Re ICLNDS Notes Acquisition, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
- Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. MullaneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re MerriamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Disciplinary Counsel v. WillardOhio Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.