Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood v. Bloedow

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 18, 2015No. 71039-7-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.

¶1 By statute, the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) collects, analyzes, and pub*610lishes health care data from state agencies and private health care providers. But the statute expressly provides that “data in any form where the patient or provider of health care can be identified” shall not be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act (PRA), chapter 42.56 RCW.1 Jonathan Bloedow submitted seven separate PRA requests to DOH to obtain the induced termination of pregnancy data reports that health care providers Planned Parenthood Everett, Feminist Women’s Health Center Renton,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Doe v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Lyft, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. SEIU 775 v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Doe v. Pierce Cnty.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Doe P v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API