Legal Opinion

Arunachalam v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 9, 2020No. 16-358Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-358 (Filed: 9 September 2020) NOT FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, * * Plaintiff, * Pro se; Patent Infringement; * RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); * Motion to Dismiss. v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * *************************************** Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam, Menlo Park, CA, pro se. Scott David Bolden, Deputy Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, Department of Justice, with whom were Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Gary L. Hausken, Director, Sarah…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API