McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Hinchman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erran Henry Circuit Court; John M. Morris, Judge. Action by the McCormick Harvesting Machine Company against Earl Hinchman. Erran a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, P. J.-
-In rule three of this court, .relating to the preparation of the transcript on appeal, it is required *84that the appellant “shall prepare an index referring to the initial page of the direct, cross and re-examination of each witness and of each pleading, exhibit and other paper in the record, such index to form the first page of the transcript.” This requirement is additional to those in that rule which relate to marginal notes. See Ewbank’s Manual, p. xlvi.
The appellee in his brief filed in due time, February 10, 1905, directed attention to the appellant’s failure to comply with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Whitaker v. LankfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. PattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Dixon v. PoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Peterson v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Smith v. SuttonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Perpetual Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. StillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911