Legal Opinion

State v. Patton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1902No. 19,756PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom Sullivan Circuit Court; O. B. Harris, Judge. Robert Patton was charged with prize-fighting. Erom a judgment sustaining his motion to quash the information, the State appéals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— Appellee was arraigned for trial upon the following charge: “That Robert Patton, late of said county, on the 25th day of June, 1901, at and in the county of Sullivan and State of Indiana, by and in pursuance of a previous arrangement and appointment with William Dickerson so to do, did then and there unlawfully engage as a principal with said William Dickerson in a fight between each other with their fists for and upon a certain wager, which wager is to the prosecuting attorney unknown.” Appellee’s' motion to quash was sustained, and the State appeals. The charge is predicated on this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ledgerwood v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Commonwealth v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Hopewell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McAdams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Glover v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Teeters v. FrostSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. State v. DaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. Business Men's ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API