Legal Opinion

Cruse v. Banks

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided December 1, 2021No. 4:19-cv-00163Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION ANDREW CLINTON CRUSE PETITIONER v. No. 4:19CV163-MPM-JMV WENDEL BANKS, ET AL. RESPONDENTS MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the court on the pro se petition of Andrew Clinton Cruse for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The State has responded to the petition; Mr. Cruse has replied, and the matter is ripe for resolution. For the reasons set forth below, the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus will be denied. Habeas Corpus Relief Under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

The writ of…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API