Legal Opinion

Worthington & Kimball Construction Co. v. C & A Development Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1989No. Nos. 20674, 20676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

These consolidated appeals stem from an action which arose out of the construction of a manufacturing plant. C & A Development and C & A Enterprises (hereinafter “C & A”) failed to pay the general contractor, Worthington & Kimball (“Worthing-ton”), the balance due on a construction contract. The claims of Worthington and the counterclaim of C & A were arbitrated pursuant to an arbitration agreement contained in the construction contract, and the board of arbitrators awarded Worthington $377,131 plus interest at 15 percent. Wor-thington sought confirmation of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Makahuena Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  3. International Resources v. DunfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. First Security Mortgage Co. v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Washington National Insurance Co. v. Sherwood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Sure-Shock Electric, Inc. v. Diamond Lofts Venture, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Portage Park Capital, LLC v. A.L.L. Masonry Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  5. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. StylerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API