Legal Opinion
Richard L. Locken v. Charles E. Robbins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1994No. 93-35450Published
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.3d 247
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Richard L. LOCKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles E. ROBBINS, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-35450.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 11, 1994.*
Decided May 18, 1994.
Before: HUG, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.