Legal Opinion

Simon v. Rizek

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 19, 1969No. Civ. No. 68-239Published

1Opinion of the Court

*603ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, while a guest in the Defendants’ home, was injured when he collided with a sliding glass door. Plaintiff seeks recovery for his injuries resulting from this accident on the grounds that (1) the door was so placed that from certain angles the doorway appeared unobstructed, (2) the Defendants should have known that there was a danger that persons might not see the glass door, and, (3) the Defendants failed to warn Plaintiff of such danger or to place markings on the door to warn of its presence. The Defendants move for Summary Judgment on the basis that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Julian v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Pruitt v. TimmeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Foster v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Rogers v. Cato Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Dye v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API