Legal Opinion

Maddox v. City of Eatonton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1911No. 2763PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari; from Putnam superior court — Judge Lewis. June 14, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtRowell, J.

1. The accusation was sufficient in form and substance, and not subject to the demurrers offered against it.

2. The courts take judicial cognizance that whisky is both spirituous and intoxicating, and no proof of these facts need be made in any case.

3. Every trial court has a broad discretion as to the order and manner of examining the witnesses in a ease, and as to allowing them to be recalled for further examination. No exercise of this discretion, unless palpably unfair and prejudicial to the complaining party, will ever be declared by this court to be reversible error. '

4. Even if there…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Clary Appliance & Furniture Center, Inc. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Stoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Perry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API