Legal Opinion

Perry v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1936No. 25836PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. “The act of March 22, 1935 (Ga. E. 1935, p. 327), known as the alcoholic beverage-control act, was not intended to become effective, in any part, as a repealing measure, independently of the election provided for therein. Whether or not the legislature exceeded its constitutional authority in submitting the act to a vote of the people, the provision for the referendum was so connected with the general scheme of the act that effect could not be given to the legislative intention, with such provision stricken. It being apparent that the legislature did not intend to put the act in force as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Daughtry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Maddox v. City of EatontonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Mrs. Mae Hester Bohannon v. Manhattan Life Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Jackson's Atlanta Ready Mix Concrete Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API