Legal Opinion
In Re Eleccion
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 17, 1995No. BAP No. NC-94-1615-MeOAs. Bankruptcy Nos. 94-10095, 94-13120PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEYERS, Bankruptcy Judge:
The orders on appeal in these cases arose after the Office of the United States Trustee objected to fees paid and agreed to be paid to the law firm of Hessinger & Associates (“Hessinger”) by Chapter 7 debtors Deborah Sogge and Mark Elección. The bankruptcy court entered an order and memorandum decision which were given a miscellaneous case number, 94 — 102, and captioned “In re Hessinger & Associates, Attorneys.” The order essentially states that any prepetition agreement for payment of Hessinger’s fees is dischargeable. Hessinger appealed from this order. After the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McDonald v. Sperna (In Re Sperna)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Walter v. Sunwest Bank (In Re Walter)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bruder v. Peaches Records & Tapes, Inc. (In Re Peaches Records & Tapes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kashani v. Fulton (In Re Kashani)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re 1095 Commonwealth Avenue Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Hines v. Gordon (In Re Hines)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re JastremUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1998
- In Re LewisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.