Legal Opinion
Raytheon Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 23, 2015No. 2015-5086PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
The United States awarded a procurement contract to one of three bidders. A General Accountability Office review process, launched by the losing bidders’ protests, then led the government to conclude, among other things, that it had given the bidders disparate information on an important subject, thereby violating a regulation that governs the bidding process. When the government reopened the bidding, the initial winning bidder protested the government’s reopening decision. The Court of Federal Claims denied the protest. Raytheon Co. v. United States, 121 Fed.Cl. 135…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dell Federal Systems, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Caddell Construction Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Professional Service Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Pricewaterhousecoopers Public Sector, LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.