U.S. Claims, Inc. v. Flomenhaft
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGROME D. DAVIS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 51), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 53) and Defendants’ Reply thereto (Doc. No. 56). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Most of the pertinent facts to this dispute have been set forth in two earlier opinions by this Court and thus need not be repeated here. See Doc. Nos. 27, 40. On February 26, 2007, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ declaratory action claim against Defendant the Stillwater Asset-Backed Fund…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Foster v. ChurchillNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lopresti v. TerwilligerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Health-Chem Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Abercrombie v. Andrew CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.