Legal Opinion
Fuqua v. Deapo
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided January 9, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 862PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN E. MILLER, Chief Judge.
The motion of defendant Diebold, Inc., for summary judgment was filed August 16, 1963, supported by an affidavit of defendant Howard Albert Deapo. Simultaneously with the filing of the motion and affidavit, the movant submitted a memorandum in support there*112of. ■ On August 24, 1963, plaintiff filed his response to the motion, and at the same time submitted to the court a memorandum in opposition to the motion. On August 26, 1963, the court granted the moving defendant leave to file an amendment to his motion and additional affidavits or other documents in support…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Sweeden v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Marion County Cooperative Ass'n. v. Carnation CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Marion County Co-Op. Ass'n v. Carnation Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Bluthenthal v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seago v. North Carolina Theatres, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
- Ayers v. Pastime Amusement CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Totten v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Ogden v. Employers Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1973
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.