Legal Opinion

Vice v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1974No. Docket 16784Published

1Opinion of the Court

53 Mich. App. 140 (1974)

218 N.W.2d 766

VICE

v.

THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.

Docket No. 16784.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided May 1, 1974.

Gage, Brukoff, Dubin & Siudara (by Richard A. Lenter), for plaintiff.

Vandeveer, Garzia, Tonkin, Kerr & Heaphy, P.C. (by Michael M. Hathaway), for defendant.

Before: BASHARA, P.J., and DANHOF and R.L. SMITH,[*] JJ.

DANHOF, J.

In this negligence action, plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's entry, in favor of defendant, of judgment notwithstanding the jury's verdict, GCR 1963, 515.2.

Judgment notwithstanding the verdict on defendant's motion was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kroll v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Serinto v. Borman Food StoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Galloway v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Huhtala v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Ruemenapp v. National Food Stores, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API