Rodgers v. American Honda Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge.
In 1965, in line with the growing concern over the fatal consequence of contributory negligence, the Maine Legislature enacted a statute permitting recovery, but reduced damages, in cases where a plaintiff, though negligent, was less so than the defendant. Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 14, § 156. Although there were a variety of state statutes in effect, the Legislature chose the English one, see Wing v. Morse, 300 A.2d 491, 497 (Me.1973), essentially word for word, see Comparative Negligence: Some New Problems for the Maine Courts, 18 Me.L.Rev. 65, 76 (1966). The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wing v. MorseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. RobersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Baker v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiryaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Stehlik v. RhoadsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Piche v. NugentDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Sarah’s Hat Boxes v Patch Me UpDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.