Legal Opinion

Ex parte Harrell v. Attorney General of South Carolina

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 9, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2014-001058; No. 27412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney General appeals the circuit court’s order finding the state grand jury lacks subject matter jurisdiction to investigate a violation of the Ethics, Government Accountability, and Campaign Reform Act1 (Ethics Act). We reverse.

Facts/Procedural Background

On February 14, 2013, the Attorney General received an ethics complaint, alleging possible violations of the Ethics Act by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Robert W. Harrell, Jr. (the Speaker), originally submitted by a private citizen to the House Legislative Ethics Committee (House Ethics Committee).2 That same day, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. AmersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Skinner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Rainey v. HaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pascoe v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  2. Pascoe v. ParksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API