Ex parte Harrell v. Attorney General of South Carolina
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The Attorney General appeals the circuit court’s order finding the state grand jury lacks subject matter jurisdiction to investigate a violation of the Ethics, Government Accountability, and Campaign Reform Act1 (Ethics Act). We reverse.
Facts/Procedural Background
On February 14, 2013, the Attorney General received an ethics complaint, alleging possible violations of the Ethics Act by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Robert W. Harrell, Jr. (the Speaker), originally submitted by a private citizen to the House Legislative Ethics Committee (House Ethics Committee).2 That same day, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- State v. AmersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Skinner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Rainey v. HaleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pascoe v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- Pascoe v. ParksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016
- State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021