Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Wurdack

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 12, 1956No. 45106PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ HOLMAN, Commissioner.

In this Workmen’s Compensation case the employer and insurer have appealed from the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the Industrial Commission. That award allowed the claimant-employee compensation for disability, -disfigurement, and medical expense in the aggregate sum of $7,770.75.

We must first consider the question of our jurisdiction of this appeal.- If -we have jurisdiction it is because “the amount in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum of seventy-five hundred dollar's.” Article V, § 3, Constitution of Missouri,' 1945, V.A.M.S.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Platies v. Theodorow Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Powers v. Universal Atlas Cement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Hardt v. City Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Scannell v. Fulton Iron Works CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Gingell v. Walters Contracting CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Garrison v. Campbell "66" Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Snowbarger v. M. F. A. Central CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Crow v. Missouri Implement Tractor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API