Hogue v. Wurdack
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
■ HOLMAN, Commissioner.
In this Workmen’s Compensation case the employer and insurer have appealed from the judgment of the circuit court affirming the award of the Industrial Commission. That award allowed the claimant-employee compensation for disability, -disfigurement, and medical expense in the aggregate sum of $7,770.75.
We must first consider the question of our jurisdiction of this appeal.- If -we have jurisdiction it is because “the amount in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum of seventy-five hundred dollar's.” Article V, § 3, Constitution of Missouri,' 1945, V.A.M.S.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Platies v. Theodorow Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Powers v. Universal Atlas Cement Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Hardt v. City Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Scannell v. Fulton Iron Works CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hogue v. WurdackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Gingell v. Walters Contracting CorporationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Garrison v. Campbell "66" Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Snowbarger v. M. F. A. Central CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Crow v. Missouri Implement Tractor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.