Legal Opinion

(PS) Sharma v. SITOA Board Members

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 5, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01070Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BIKRAM SHARMA, No. 2:19-cv-1070-JAM-EFB PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 SITOA BOARD MEMBERS (ASIF MEHMOOD, FARHAD MUHAIUDIN, 14 MOHAMMAD HAWARNEH, MUSHTQ A. KING, ZAHID KHAN), 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 This case was before the court on August 28, 2019, for hearing on defendants’ motion to 19 dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 20 Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 4) and plaintiff’s motion to remand the case to state court 21…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API