Sewell v. Tuthill
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM CUMBERLAND. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Cumberland County. — D. L. Lansden, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
This was an original attachment suit brought in the chancery court of Cumberland county to recover $500 alleged to be due to the complainant from the defendants by reason of the breach of a contract for the sale of certain lumber. An attachment was regularly issued as prayed for in.the bill on the sixtetnth- of March, 1903, and on the next day was by the sheriff of Cumberland county regularly levied upon certain lumber.
On the twenty-eighth of April the defendants filed a plea in abatement, in which they averred that none of the property levied on under the writ of attachment belonged to them…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bamberger v. Citizens' Street Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Simpson v. Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Railroad v. McCollumTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Cowan, McClung & Co. v. DonaldsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Rogers v. O'MaryTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lieberman, Loveman Cohn v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. BaylesTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- White v. HenryTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
- Ex parte CalhounTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. MankinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.